2024 Past Events
Series: Engineering Risks, Disasters, and Corporate Behavior
Organized by Carol Séquin and Donald Mastronarde
Part I: A Memorial Lecture on the Engineering Aspects of the World Trade Center Collapse
Tuesday, September 10th
Speaker: Albolhassan Astaneh-Asl, Professor Emeritus of Structural Engineering, astaneh@berkeley.edu
Topic: First, this Memorial lecture honors the memories of the victims of the tragic and criminal terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001, as well as pays tribute to the first responders, the firefighters, EMTs, and police officers, who so heroically sacrificed their lives to save others. Second, the lecture focuses on the engineering aspects of the tragic collapse of the World Trade Center. Dr. Astaneh, with a grant from the National Science Foundation flew to New York a week after the tragic 9/11 attacks, when the flights to New York resumed, and conducted the reconnaissance and investigation of the collapsed WTC towers. In May of 2002, he testified before the Committee on Science of the House of Representative as part of World Trade Center Public Hearings. Subsequently provided with unique access to all the plans and structural drawings of the WTC, he worked for the next six years with his team of volunteer engineers and Berkeley students, performing a detailed and extensive nonlinear finite element analysis of the impact of the planes on the towers.
His team’s investigation revealed that the World Trade Center towers were constructed using an unusual structural system called steel “Bearing Walls'', where the weight of the building was given to relatively thin stiffened steel plate bearing walls on the outside and steel columns on the inside that were connected to the outside walls with steel truss joists instead of the usual vertical columns and horizontal beams connected to each other with sturdy connections. The investigation showed that from an engineering point of view, the main cause of the collapse was due to the use of this unusual steel “bearing wall” system, very vulnerable to impact and fire. The study also showed that had the structure been designed using a traditional beam and column configuration following the governing design codes instead of the unusual steel bearing wall system, the damage would have been limited to localized failure, and the towers most likely would not have collapsed.
══════════════
Series: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Literature
Organized by Donald Mastronarde
Part I: Sexuality, Novels, and Problems of Translation
Tuesday, October 1st
Speaker: Michael Lucey, Professor of French and Comparative Literature, mlucey@berkeley.edu
Topic: How do you talk about sexuality when talking about different times and places in which different languages are spoken and different implicit structures of cultural concepts produce the social forms within which sex/gender and sexuality take place? Add to this the problem of the co-existence in the same social space of multiple sexual ideologies and sexual cultures, as well as of multiple languages. “Given that the novel is a fundamentally monolingual form,” Amitav Ghosh has asked, “how does it deal with characters whose linguistic identities are complex and unsettled?” This article looks at novelistic situations in which both linguistic and sexual identities are “complex and unsettled.” What are translation’s limits in such situations? What kind of linguistic anthropological work can novels do? Literary examples are drawn from works by James Baldwin, Tahar Ben Jelloun, Abdellah Taïa, and Mohamed Mbougar Sarr.
┉┈◈◉◈┈┉
Part II: Jean-Jacques Rousseau on the Unnaturalness of Sex, Love, and Marriage
Tuesday, October 8th
Speaker: William Burton, Assistant Professor of French, affiliate faculty, Center for Science, Medicine, Technology, and Society [NB: pronouns they, them, theirs], wmb@berkeley.edu
Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s sexual politics have long been a stumbling block to feminists interested in his thought. He called for a sex-segregated society, and his arguments often seem to presuppose that men and women’s social roles are determined by biology. Following the lead of the lesbian feminist Monique Wittig, this talk will show that Rousseau did not espouse such a belief. Instead, he envisioned a state of nature from which the categories of sex were absent, and argued for the necessity of creating them. These ideas developed in debate with the philosopher John Locke and the scientist Georges-Louis Leclerc de Buffon, who claimed that romantic love and marriage existed prior to society. Marshalling a variety of data, Rousseau claimed that both were social institutions, and although he did not say so explicitly, his argumentation reveals that for him, the sexes were not natural, either, but linguistic conventions.
══════════════
Series: Berkeley in Space
Organized by Donald Mastronarde
Part I: A Case in Favor of Space Exploration
Tuesday, October 29th
Speaker: Panos Papadopoulos (Department of Mechanical Engineering), Director of College of Engineering Aerospace Programs
Topic: Aerospace engineering is currently experiencing extraordinary growth driven primarily by space (as opposed to atmospheric) flight. In this seminar, a case will be made about the present and future opportunities associated with space exploration.
┉┈◈◉◈┈┉
Part II: Transforming Astrophysics with AI
Tuesday, November 5th
Speaker: Joshua S. Bloom, Professor of Astronomy
Topic: In this talk, Professor Bloom will describe ways in which astrophysics is leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) to break through some computational and human bottlenecks that otherwise impede scientific progress. Rather than just adopt existing approaches developed for industrial applications, astrophysics is also helping to drive new AI research directions.
┉┈◈◉◈┈┉
Part III: The Renaissance of Astrophysics
Tuesday, November 12th
Speaker: Raffaella Margutti, Associate Professor, Astronomy Department and Physics Department
Topic: This lecture will review how new observational capabilities to study the night sky have led to recent discoveries and new ways to think about the universe around us.
══════════════
The Carol D’Onofrio LIR Lecture in Public Health
Carol D’Onofrio was Chair of the UCB Retirement Center Board from 2009-2011 and served as a member at large from 2006-08. She served on the Learning in Retirement Committee for many years, chairing the committee in 2017-2019. Carol passed away on April 14, 2020.
Embracing Controversy: A Second Look at CDC Reforms After Covid-19
Click here to view the recording.
Speaker: Ann Keller, Associate Professor of Health Politics, UC Berkeley School of Public Health
Addressing criticism that the agency’s Covid-19 response was lacking, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has proposed internal agency reforms intended to improve its performance during the next pandemic. This talk offers a critique of reform efforts that imply that failure-free performance is achievable if the agency simply improves its access to information collection and processing. Drawing from social science scholarship that addresses the social processes that support scientific learning and policymaking in contested political environments, I ask whether science-informed policy can emerge without controversy and deliberation. Finally, this talk examines what standards public health officials can be held to when one replaces the goal of omniscience with one of transparent learning.